- +370 668 00 113
- [email protected]
A local authority website should work like a reliable front desk for residents: clear, accessible and easy to use. People need to understand what service they need, what documents to prepare, how long a process may take and what to do if their case does not fit the standard route.
Many local authority websites mirror the internal structure of the organisation. Residents, however, are trying to solve a practical issue such as applying for a permit, reporting a problem or arranging school registration. When services are grouped by department, people struggle to find the right route and staff receive avoidable calls and emails.
Residents often do not know what happens after they submit a form or application. If stages, expected timeframes and next steps are not explained clearly, people contact the authority for updates that could have been provided online. This creates extra work for teams and weakens trust in the process.
Local authorities often publish formal documents without explaining what they mean in practice. Residents may be able to access the document, but still not understand whether it affects them, what action is required or which supporting documents to provide. This leads to confusion, incomplete submissions and repeated enquiries.
If a website is difficult to use with assistive technology, keyboard navigation or clear content structure, some residents cannot access services independently. Accessibility issues also affect older users and people with temporary impairments. For public bodies, this is both a service quality issue and a compliance risk.
We organise content around common resident needs such as housing, education, permits, benefits and local reporting. Each service page sets out the steps, required documents, eligibility points, contact routes and expected timelines in a format people can follow.
We present service journeys in a way that shows what happens before submission, during review and after a decision. This helps residents understand responsibilities, likely waiting periods and what to do if additional information is needed.
We add practical summaries alongside formal decisions, regulations and notices so residents can understand the impact on their situation. This keeps official content intact while making it more usable for non-specialist audiences.
We test content structure, navigation, forms and interface components against recognised accessibility requirements, using manual review and established testing tools. Findings are prioritised and documented so improvements can be managed as part of ongoing governance.
We provide structured support for updates, issue resolution, content changes and quality checks. Reporting gives teams visibility over website performance, accessibility actions, content priorities and operational risks.
Residents usually start with a task, not with knowledge of the authority's internal structure. Organising services around real situations helps people find the right information faster and reduces avoidable contact with staff.
No. Publication supports transparency, but residents also need a clear explanation of what the document means, who it applies to and what action is required. Plain-language summaries help people use the information correctly without replacing the official text.
Not entirely. Local authorities share common service patterns, but local priorities, service arrangements, languages and governance requirements differ. The website should reflect the authority's actual services, processes and resident needs.
The local authority must own the domain and hosting to ensure data control and operational continuity.
